People v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 48 Ill. 2d 371 - The People v. Mendoza · 78 Ill. App. 2d 431 - People v. Harden · 10 Ill. App. 3d 558 - People v. Anderson · 38 Ill. 2d 559 - The People v. Harden · 3 Ill. App. 3d 293 - People v. Reed
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The rule that a defendant understand the nature of the charge against him does not require the court to recite all the facts which constitute an offense. It is sufficient for the court to state to the accused the essence or general character of the offense.” 21 Ill.App.3d 759,761 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In reviewing the admonitions of the trial court to the defendant, a common sense approach must be taken to determine whether there has been substantial compliance with the provisions of the Rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.