Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 ILLCTCL 321 - Clayton v. State

Clayton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co. · State Ex Rel. Moss v. Hamilton · Puterbaugh v. Wadham · People ex rel. Holdom v. Sweitzer · State Ex Rel. Harvey v. Linville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““None of the evils sought to be eliminated by the constitutional provisions can possibly arise where the change in compensation is automatically accomplished through the happening of a contingency, such as a fluctuation in population over which the office holder has no control, as is the case now before the Court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.