Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ind. 267

Howard v. Babcock

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1863-11-15

<p>Rule 30. — Unless a bill of exceptions contain the words, “this was all the evidence given in the cause,” it will not exclude the presumption of other evidence.</p>

Decided 1863-11-15

Per Curiam.

¶1There is no question made in this case, except as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding. The record does not contain all the evidence, as the bill of exceptions does not comply with the 30th rule, by stating that “ this was all the evidence given in the cause.”

¶2The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

/21/ind/267 · .json · Public domain