Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 INDAPP 302 - Douglas v. State

Douglas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
May 1947
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1947

9 state decisions

40189819001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Epps v. State · Shular v. State · Coleman v. State · Welsh v. State · Grubb v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the court, as matter of law, must know that beer is a malt liquor, it is not necessary to a conviction for the jury, besides finding a sale of beer, to find also, as a matter of fact, that beer — that is,, malt liquor — is intoxicating.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.