PONCE DE LEON’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 503 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1102 (§ 102 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · United States v. Nixon · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Chrysler Corporation v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The BIA does not] assess[] regulatory compliance with the APA, ... [and should make no] observations in this area where we lack expertise. We ourselves are exclusively a creature of the Attorney General's regulations, and we have properly left it to the courts to resolve questions of APA compliance.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Wen-Wan Chang Tsung-Ming Chang Chiao-Ying Chang Yi Yuan Chiang Hsien-Ming Hsieh Shu-Chuan Hsieh Pei-Chen Hsieh Sung Duck Kong Hye Ra Kong Hyun Jung Kong Min Suk Kong Yei-Chien Lai Yu Kuei Lai Yen Chih Lai Chen Ju Lai Yoon Sik Lee Jong Hee Lee Eung Jun Lee Sang Eun Lee Eung Sang Lee Cheng-Hsiung She Hui Wen She Tzu Ming She Alabama Almark, Lp Alabama Bailey Lp Alabama Coosa Lp Alabama Dallas Lp Alabama Denim Lp Alabama Millry Lp Alabama Pro Sports Lp Alabama Rive Run Lp C & W Hotel Lp Delaware Milford Lp Georgia Almark Lp Louisiana Lasevilla Lp Mississippi Bass Lp Mississippi Magee Lp Mississippi McT Lp Mississippi Neely Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships Mississippi Tees Lp, a Mississippi Limited Partnership National Steak Restaurants Lp North Carolina K-Barb Lp North Carolina Russell-Harvelle Hosiery Lp Pennsylvania Loungewear Lp Recap Fund I Lp Recap Fund v. Lp Rpc Fund I Lp South Carolina Manufacturing Lp Tennessee Lafayette Lp Wtc Fund I Lp United States Export Fund I Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships v. United States of America, Wen-Wan Chang Tsung-Ming Chang Chiao-Ying Chang Yi Yuan Chiang Hsien-Ming Hsieh Shu-Chuan Hsieh Pei-Chen Hsieh Sung Duck Kong Hye Ra Kong Hyun Jung Kong Min Suk Kong Yei-Chien Lai Yu Kuei Lai Yen Chih Lai Chen Ju Lai Yoon Sik Lee Jong Hee Lee Eung Jun Lee Sang Eun Lee Eung Sang Lee Cheng-Hsiung She Hui Wen She Tzu Ming She Alabama Almark, Lp Alabama Bailey Lp Alabama Coosa Lp Alabama Dallas Lp Alabama Denim Lp Alabama Millry Lp Alabama Pro Sports Lp Alabama Rive Run Lp C & W Hotel Lp Delaware Milford Lp Georgia Almark Lp Louisiana Lasevilla Lp Mississippi Bass Lp Mississippi Magee Lp Mississippi McT Lp Mississippi Neely Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships Mississippi Tees Lp, a Mississippi Limited Partnership National Steak Restaurants Lp North Carolina K-Barb Lp North Carolina Russell-Harvelle Hosiery Lp Pennsylvania Loungewear Lp Recap Fund I Lp Recap Fund v. L Rpc Fund I Lp South Carolina Manufacturing Lp Tennessee Lafayette Lp Wtc Fund I Lp United States Export Fund I Lp, Maryland Limited Partnerships v. United States · Chang
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.