THOMAS’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2024
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lozada v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Pino v. Landon · Paredes-Urrestarazu v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Oviawe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · White v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the nature of [the applicant's] contacts [with the criminal justice system] and the stage to which those proceedings have progressed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Perez v. Barr · Rosa v. Garland“[i]t is well settled that a conviction does not attain a sufficient degree of finality for immigration purposes until direct appellate review of the conviction has been exhausted or waived. Consequently, a non-final conviction cannot support a charge of deportability. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abiodun v. Gonzales“the probative value of and corresponding weight, if any, assigned to evidence of criminality will vary according to the facts and circumstances of each case and the nature and strength of the evidence presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rosa v. Garland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.