Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 I&NDEC 27 - GRIJALVA

GRIJALVA’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
October 2022
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder (2011), Salta v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2002)

27 federal appellate · 1 district ·

5201995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252B (§ 242b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya · Randolph Central School District v. Aldrich · Powell v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n the absence of new or contrary language, we find that our holding in Huete continues to be applicable to the accomplishment of service of the Order to Show Cause by certified mail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a bald and unsupported denial of receipt of certified mail notices is not sufficient to support a motion to reopen”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the evidence necessary to support the motion to reopen must be presented to the Immigration Judge,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.