Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 I&NDEC 337 - H

H’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2025
most recently cited

29 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Shi Liang Lin v. United States Department of Justice (2007), Negusie v. Holder (2009)

29 federal appellate ·

3201996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Acewicz v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ravindran v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Gomez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can be characterized as a `particular social group' within Somalia, of which respondent is a member.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the regulations envision that he or she ordinarily will proceed to accept further evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “victims were reportedly singled out for no reason other than their clan affiliation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.