Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 I&NDEC 357 - KASINGA

KASINGA’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2025
most recently cited

49 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Mohammed v. Gonzales (2005), Bah v. Mukasey (2008)

49 federal appellate ·

5801996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co. · Rust v. Sullivan · Fatin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sanchez-Trujillo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can result in permanent loss of genital sensation and can adversely affect sexual and erotic functions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is practiced, at least in some significant part, to overcome sexual characteristics of young women”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The applicant did not attempt a fraudulent entry into the United States. Rather, upon arrival at Newark International Airport on December 17, 1994, she immediately requested asylum.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.