Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 I&NDEC 472 - GRIJALVA

GRIJALVA’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Iturribarria v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003), Twum v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2005)

13 federal appellate ·

2701996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252B (§ 242b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Lozada v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Patel v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an employee of his prior attorney called to inform him that there had been a continuance and that he should not appear at the Immigration Court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We note that an alien is not required to show prejudice in order to rescind an order of deportation entered following a hearing conducted in absentia under section 242B(c)(3) of the Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “that the respondent, who had no reason not to rely on his counsel at this juncture, was blatantly misled regarding his need to appear at the scheduled hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.