Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 I&NDEC 475 - FUALAAU

FUALAAU’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2022 · most notably Gill v. Immigration & Naturalization Services (2005), Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder (2009)

21 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 241

Relies on Grageda v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Franklin v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Maria Guadalupe Guerrero De Nodahl v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice · Advance Mortgage Corporation v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago v. Economy Mechanical Industries, Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order for an assault of the nature at issue in this case to be deemed a crime involving moral turpitude, the element of a reckless state of mind must be coupled with an offense involving the infliction of serious bodily injury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “simple assault is not considered to be a crime involving moral turpitude.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.