Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 KAN 722 - Titus v. Corkins

Titus v. Corkins’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
5
states following
January 1990
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1990

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

301879188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. Compton · Welch v. Durand · Fisher v. Hamilton · Lessee of Sheldon v. Coates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But punitive damages mean more than compensation; they imply punishment, and are to deter the wrong-doer, as well as compensate the injured.” (p. 723.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.