Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 KAN 99 - Duncan v. Baker

Duncan v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
6
states following
November 1956
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently November 1956

11 state decisions

40187818801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Britton v. Turner · Carroll v. Welch · Lamb v. Brolaski · Ryan v. Dayton · Hillyard v. Crabtree's Adm'r

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““.Of course, in all cases where the employer can refuse to accept the work and does refuse to accept it or returns it, he is not bound to pay for it unless it exactly corresponds with the contract; but where he receives it and retains it, whether he retains it from choice or from necessity, he is bound to pay for the same what it is reasonably worth, less any damage that he may sustain by reason of the partial non-fulfilment of the contract. Of course, he is not bound to pay anything unless the work is worth something, unless he receives or- may receive some actual benefit therefrom.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If one party, without the fault of the other, fails to perform his side of the contract in such manner a.s to enable him to sue upon it, still, if the other party has derived a benefit from the part performed, it would be unjust to allow him to retain that without paying anything. The law, therefore, generally implies a promise on his part to pay such a remuneration as the benefit conferred upon him is reasonably worth; and to recover that quantum of remuneration, an action of indebitatus assumpsit is maintainable.” 2nd. Pars. Cont. (6th Edition) 523.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.