Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 KANAPP2D 347 - Baggett v. B & G Construction

Baggett v. B & G Construction’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lytle v. Stearns · In re Hylton · 10 Kan. App. 2d 501 - Springston v. IML Freight, Inc. · 16 Kan. App. 2d 458 - Bennett v. Wichita Fence Co. · Elder v. Arma Mobile Transit Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]his assault was clearly not precipitated by a work-related matter. However, bke Bennett, Baggett’s injury was partly the result of work-related circumstances. Bennett may not have crashed into a tree during an epileptic seizure had he not been working. Likewise, Baggett would not have sustained a serious head injury and broken clavicle during a pushing match had he not been on the job site, which contained an open hole.” 21 Kan. App. 2d at 350 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.