Grimmett v. Burke’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
16 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of Revenue (2005), 26 Kan. App. 2d 482 - Grimmett v. S & W Auto Sales Co. (1999)
16 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts · Micheaux v. Amalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local P-94 · Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services · Kansas State Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. Goertzen · McCart v. Muir
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) The original service must have `appeared' to be valid and the returns by the sheriff's office or other process servers must indicate that the service was valid. (2) The record should show that the plaintiff believed in good faith that his or her service was valid and relied on that validity to his or her detriment. (3) The plaintiff had no reason to believe the defendant was contesting service until after the statute of limitations had run, but had no opportunity to take steps to correct the defective service. " (Emphasis added.)”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage““If service of process or first publication purports to have been made but is later adjudicated to have been invalid due to any irregularity in form or procedure or any defect in making service, the action shall nevertheless be deemed to have been commenced at the applicable time under subsection (a) if valid service is obtained or first publication is made within 90 days after that adjudication, except that the court may extend that time an additional 30 days upon a showing of good cause by the plaintiff.””
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“Grimmett appears to argue that under K.S.A. 40-284, uninsured motorist coverage is available when the operator is uninsured even though the owner of the automobile is covered by a policy. Grimmett is wrong. “The majority view in this country, which we adopt in the present case, is that a vehicle of which either the owner or driver is covered by minimum insurance coverage is not ‘uninsured’ even though one of those persons has no insurance.” State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cummings, 13 Kan.App.2d 630, 634 , 778 P.2d 370 (1989), rev. denied 245 Kn. 786 (1989).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.