Stuart v. Douglas County’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2007
most recently cited
2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Oklahoma v. New Mexico · 20 Kan. App. 2d 277 - Foulk v. Colonial Terrace · Boatright v. Kansas Racing Commission · Sedlak v. Dick · In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[B]y the time the Board issued its order on February 13, 1995, the remedial legislation had cured the Board’s constitutional problems: The Board had jurisdiction, and its failure to transfer the case to a district court was harmless. The legislation would have required the case to be transferred right back to the Board.” 21 Kan. App. 2d at 787 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.