Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 LED 812 - United States v. Buzzo

United States v. Buzzo’s Empirical Analysis

1873

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2018 · most notably Coffin v. Ogden (1873), Insurance Company v. Folsom (1873)

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

180187318801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Buzzo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That any person who shall make . or issue any instrument, document, or paper-, of any kind or description whatsoever, .... for the payment of money, without the same being duly stamped, .... with intent to evade the provisions of this act, shall for every such offence forfeit the sum of $50,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “And if a special, verdict on a mixed question of fact and law find facts from which this court can draw clear conclusions, it is no objection to the verdict that, the jury have not themselves drawn such conclusions, and stated them as facts in the case-”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the acts which create the obstruction [evasion] are in themselves unlawful, the intention to obstruct [evade] will be imputed to their author, although the attainment of other ends may have been his primary object.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.