Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Md. App. 428 - Christensen v. State

21 Md. App. 428 - Christensen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2018

12 state decisions

6019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Di Re · Graves v. United States · Burgess v. United States · United States v. Beekman · Pennewell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . .. even in criminal cases is that if a party has it peculiarly within his power to produce witnesses whose testimony would elucidate the transaction, the fact that he does not do it creates the presumption that the testimony, if produced, would be unfavorable.” Graves v. United States, 150 U. S. 118, 121 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In a case determined by little more than which of two persons is to be believed, possible inferences, whether naturally or legally raised, become crucial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.