Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 MINN 15 - Gill v. Bradley

Gill v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis

1874

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
8
states following
February 1940
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1940

16 state decisions

5018741880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leaird v. . Smith · Smith v. Smith · Allshouse v. Ramsay · Green v. Finin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule at common law was, that if no place was appointed for the payment of money, (as appears to be the fact in the case at bar,) if the person to whom the money was due was out of England, the debtor was not bound to go out of the realm to make him a tender. Bacon’s Abr. Tender, C. So in Allshouse v. Ramsay, 6 Whart. 331 , it is held that when a contract is made in one state of the Union for the payment of money, and no place of payment is designated, the debtor is not bound to go to another state to tender the money to the creditor. To the same effect, Smith v. Smith, 25 Wend. 405 ; s. c. 2 Hill, 351 ; 2 Gr. Ev. § 601, note 3; Tasker v. Bartlett, 5 Cush. 359 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.