Halprin v. Schachne’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
July 1958
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule of law is that a broker is entitled to his commission when the minds of the parties have met on every material particular of the transaction. Here, in this case, however, the minds of the parties in regard to the transaction have never met, because the validity of the contract was made dependent upon the condition that the defendants' attorney approve of the contract. The defendants' attorney never approved of the contract.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Daly v. Dubitzky“For that reason the condition upon which the broker's commission depended and which entitled him in law to recover was never fulfilled, and he is not entitled to recover.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Daly v. Dubitzky
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.