Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 MJ 140 - United States v. Burris

United States v. Burris’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

145
cited by 145 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2017
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 145 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably Solorio v. United States (1987), United States v. Bradford (1987)

6201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 862 · 10 U.S.C. § 866 · 10 U.S.C. § 867 · 10 U.S.C. § 880 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Marshall v. Lonberger · Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe · Lee v. United States · United States v. Nance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 145 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n ruling on an appeal under this section, the Court of Military Review may act only with respect to matters of law, notwithstanding section 866(c) of this title (article 66(c)).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that many of the problems involved in attributing pretrial delays will be ameliorated if all such requests for delay, together with the reasons therefor, were acted upon by the convening authority prior to referral of charges to a court-martial, or by the trial judge after such referral, rather than for them to be the subject of negotiation and agreement between opposing counsel. This procedural requirement will establish as a matter of record who requested what delay and for what reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.