United States v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2017
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 825 · 10 U.S.C. § 920
Relies on United States v. Lenoir · United States v. Blaylock · United States v. Harville · United States v. Tagert · United States v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree that Article 25(c)(1) was intended to apply when an enlisted court member is “attached ... for administrative, disciplinary and court-martial purposes” to the same unit as the accused— even though he is not formally assigned to that unit. United States v. Anderson, [ 10 M.J. 803 (A.F.C.M.R.1981) ] at 805.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.