Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 MJ 251 - United States v. Solorio

United States v. Solorio’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2022
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022

17019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 839 · 10 U.S.C. § 862 · 10 U.S.C. § 880 · 18 U.S.C. § 1501 (Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002)

Relies on Village of Euclid Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co · New York v. Ferber · Morris v. Slappy · Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell · O'Callahan v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A military judge's factfinding power under Article 62 cannot be superseded by a Court of Military Review in an appeal under Article 62. . . . To some extent the Court of Military Review may have erred in this direction; but any such error is immaterial, because on the basis of undisputed facts, we conclude that the offenses in Alaska were service-connected”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “precedents involving off-base sex offenses against civilian dependents of military personnel would point to a different conclusion,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not every off-base offense against a servicemember's dependent is service-connected,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.