United States v. DiCupe’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2001
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 827 · 10 U.S.C. § 921
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Decoster · United States v. Fortes · United States v. Rivas · United States v. Jefferson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that the person acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Review of a defense counsel’s trial strategy is difficult, if not impossible, on appeal because the appellate court is not privy to the. knowledge of the trial participants except to the extent such information appears in the record of trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.