Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Mo. App. 295

Kneale v. Price

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1886

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1886-03-22

Hemet S. Kellet, Judge. Statement of case by the court. This is an action upon a contract, brought by the plaintiff, to recover damages resulting to him by reason of stock trespassing on his lands, in consequence of the failure of the defendant to maintain and keep in repair a certain fence.

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1915

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““While the petition is not good as a pleading framed on the statute, it nevertheless, in our opinion, sets forth a good cause of action at common law; and whore such is the case the causó should be proceeded with.””

quoted by 1 later decision, including Filler v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.

Relies on Comings v. Hannibal & Central Missoum Railroad

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1886-03-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ellison, J.

¶1— It appears to be conceded that the petition in this cause did not state a cause of action under section 5661, Revised Statutes. It was drawn with a view to a cause of action under that section as clearly appears from the prayer. Notwithstanding such was the intention of the pleader the objection, for the reason there was no cause of action stated, should have been overruled, if a valid common law action appears from the body of the petition, and we think it does so appear. “ While the petition is not good as a pleading-framed on the statute, it nevertheless, in our opinion, sets forth a good cause of action at common law; and where such is the case the cause should be proceeded with. If we treat the petition as embracing merely a common law cause of action, it was not demurrable because it asked for double damages. The character of the petition is not always determined by the relief it prays for. The court may grant any relief consistent with the case and embraced within the issues.” Comings v. Ry. Co., 48 Mo. 512.

¶2The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Philips, P. J., concurs; Hall, J., absent.
/21/moapp/295 · .json · Public domain