Dazet v. Landry’s Empirical Analysis
1892
Citation profile
2 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2019
2 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Humphrey v. McGill · Bliss v. Arnold, Leggitt & Lapham · Illingworth & Clark v. Miltenberger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]t an auction sale of real property, the sale is not complete until the hammer drops; at any time before the property is struck off, the bidder may recall his bid. After the property is struck off to a bidder it is a complete contract; and on the party making the bid failing to comply with his part of the contract, and pay the sum bid, the sheriff is required to re-sell the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Grant““The highest bidder acquires no title to the thing purchased but by payment of the purchase money, and if he fails to do this within a reasonable time, a re-sale may lawfully be made.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.