Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 N.J. Super. 180 - State v. Winne

21 N.J. Super. 180 - State v. Winne’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
4
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2005

2 district · 14 state decisions

60195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lanzetta v. State New Jersey · Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · Bradley v. Fisher · Pargoud v. United States · Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. Dodge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where a power rests in judgment or discretion, so that it is of a judicial nature or character, but does not involve the exercise of the functions of a judge, or is conferred upon an officer other than judicial officer, it is generally deemed ‘quasi-judicial.’ Throop, Public Officers, Sec. 533. It is defined as a term applied to the action and discretion of public administrative officers, who are required to investigate facts, and draw conclusions from them, as a basis for their official action, and to exercise discretion of a judicial nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In a broad sense, "judicial discretion" is the option which a judge may exercise either to do or not to do that which is proposed to him that he shall do; choosing between the doing and not doing of a thing, the doing of which cannot be demanded as an absolute right of the party asking it to be done; the exercise of the right legally to determine between two or more courses of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.