Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 N.M. 599 - Strickland v. Johnson

Strickland v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 1963
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1963

11 state decisions

70191619201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapin v. . Dobson · Wheaton Roller-Mill Co. v. John T. Noye Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the agreement between the parties is one and entire, and only a part of this is reduced to writing, it would seem that the residue may be proved by extrinsic evidence.” 2 Parsons on Contracts, § 553.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.