Kemp Lumber Co. v. Whitlatch’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1957
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cofield v. McClelland · Tucker v. McCoy · Robertson v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But the Legislature clearly manifests its intention that such suits may be- brought only where the legal title, as a matter of fact, stands in the name of the probate judge, as trustee, * * * »”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.