Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 N.Y.2d 990 - Simpson v. Loehmann

Simpson v. Loehmann’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1987 · most notably Rush v. Savchuk (1980), Minichiello v. Rosenberg (1968)

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 16 state decisions

570196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matter of United States of Mexico v. Schmuck · Mississippi Shipbuilding Corporation v. . Lever Bros. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This, it is hardly necessary to add, means that there may not be any recovery against the defendant in this sort of case in an amount greater than the face value of such insurance policy even though he proceeds with the defense on the merits. Consideration of CPLR 320 (subd. [c]) and its effect in other types of action begun by attachment must, of coilrse, await future cases.” 290 N.Y.S. 2d at 916 , 238 N.E.2d at 320 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “expand the basis for in persona jurisdiction in view of the fact that the recovery is necessarily limited to the value of the asset attached, that is, the liability insurance policy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.