21 Ohio App. 322 - Kronenberg v. Whale’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2012
2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the mere right to have the petition amended to conform to the proof, even though the same was not done, is treated by the reviewing court as if the amendment had been made, providing the evidence in the case made the subject of the amendment a triable issue, and further provided that the issue was one of the theories upon which the case was tried.” Kronenberg v. Whale, 21 Oh Ap, 322, 334, 153 N. E. 302 . (Motion to certify record overruled, 23 O. L. R. 609); Vol. 31 O. Jur. p. 947.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holbrook v. Frey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.