21 Ohio App. 2d 160 - State v. Newkirk’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably 51 Ohio St. 3d 46 - Doyle v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (1990), State v. Hoover (2009)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Solomon v. Liquor Control Commission · 77 Ohio App. 298 - State v. Joiner · 7 Ohio App. 2d 165 - Wilsch v. Bencar · 14 Ohio App. 2d 35 - City of Cincinnati v. Bossert MacHine Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whenever a person is found guilty under the laws of this state or any ordinance of any political subdivision thereof, of operating a motor vehicle in violation of such laws or ordinances, relating to reckless operation, the trial court of any court of record may, in addition to or independent of all other penalties provided by law, suspend for any period of time or revoke the license to drive of any person so convicted or pleading guilty to such offenses for such period as it determines, not to exceed one year.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"A license to operate a motor vehicle is a privilege and not a property right. The state has the right under its sovereign power to control automobile traffic by reasonable regulations of the circumstances under which its citizens may be licensed to operate a motor vehicle and to adopt appropriate provisions to insure competence and care on the part of the licensees, to protect others using the highways; and any appropriate means adopted does not deny to a person subject to its provisions any constitutional rights under the Constitution of the United States or the state of Ohio. See Wilsch v. Bencar, 7 Ohio App.2d 165 , 219 N.E.2d 311 ; Paduchik v. Mikoff, 112 N.E.2d 69 , 64 Ohio Law Abs. 150 . Also, see, Solomon v. Liquor Control Comm., 4 Ohio St.2d 31 , 212 N.E.2d 595 , relating to a different type of license, but wherein the matter for determination was the suspension or revocation of a permit."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.