Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ohio App. 2d 271 - Motorists Mutual Ins. v. Tomanski

21 Ohio App. 2d 271 - Motorists Mutual Ins. v. Tomanski’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1978
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Horne v. Insurance Company · 212 F. Supp. 349 - Hobbs v. Buckeye Union Casualty Company · 236 F. Supp. 370 - Southern v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(A) No policy insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for bodily injury or death suffered by any person arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle shall be issued, delivered, renewed, or extended in this State with respect to a motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this State unless the policy includes the coverage described in subsection (B) of this section. (B) The policy referred to in subsection (A) of this section shall provide coverage therein or supplemental thereto for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to- recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles * * * because of bodily injury, * * * including death resulting therefrom. Coverage shall not be less than the amounts or limits prescribed for bodily injury or death for a policy meeting the requirements of 47 O.S.1961, § 204, as the same may be hereafter amended; provided, however, that larger amounts of liability may be offered and purchased if desired.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.