21 Ohio App. 2d 76 - Bulloch v. Bulloch’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1975
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 165 Ohio St. 456 - Lower v. Ehrhart · Peters v. Peters · 138 Ohio St. 187 - Tullis v. Tullis · 110 Ohio App. 546 - Clelland v. Clelland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Since remarriage would he only a reason for the exercise of such jurisdiction . . ., and would not itself create jurisdiction, it would appear that Dailey inferentially holds that where the decree of alimony, even if predicated upon a separation agreement, is for an indefinite payment of alimony without any provision for termination, a reservation of jurisdiction for modification under change of circumstances might well he implied.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.