21 Ohio App. 3d 104 - Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum v. Ratnet’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2013
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lundgren v. Freeman · 68 Ohio App. 2d 58 - Braverman v. Spriggs · York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co. · T. & M. Transp. Co. v. S. W. Shattuck Chemical Co. · North Drive-In Theatre Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Park-In Theatres, Inc. Park-In Theatres Company Willis Warren Smith, Vigor Cranston Smith, Richard M. Hollingshead, Jr., Annie C. Boyle, and Cross-Appellants. Denver Drive-In Theatre Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Park-In Theatres, Inc. Park-In Theatres Company Willis Warren Smith, Vigor Cranston Smith, Richard M. Hollingshead, Jr., Annie C. Boyle, and Cross-Appellants. South Drive-In Theatre Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Park-In Theatres, Inc. Park-In Theatres Company Willis Warren Smith, Vigor Cranston Smith, Richard M. Hollingshead, Jr., Annie C. Boyle, and Cross-Appellants. West Drive-In Theatre Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Park-In Theatres, Inc. Park-In Theatres Company Willis Warren Smith, Vigor Cranston Smith, Richard M. Hollingshead, Jr., Annie C. Boyle, and Cross-Appellants
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] trial court has no authority to vacate its orders sua sponte”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.