21 Ohio App. 3d 270 - Doe v. Cuddy’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Hagans v. Lavine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A claim may be held plainly insubstantial under the test only if it is obviously without merit or if its unsoundness so clearly results from previous judicial decisions that it must be said that the subject is foreclosed and that there is no room for the inference that the question sought to be raised can be a matter of legitimate controversy. [Citations omitted.]” Id., 21 Ohio App.3d at 273 , 21 OBR at 344, 487 N.E.2d at 917 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““[I]n any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title * * * the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.