Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Ohio App. 3d 91 - State v. Depina

21 Ohio App. 3d 91 - State v. Depina’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2017

15 state decisions

901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Curry · State v. Burson · State v. Ware

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the probative value of such conduct lies in its peculiar character rather than its proximity to the event at issue.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[Although `other acts evidence aimed at showing an idiosyncratic pattern of conduct should not be so remote from the offense charged as to render them non-probative, logic does not require that they necessarily be near the offense at issue in both place and time. * * * The key to the probative value of such conduct lies in its peculiar character rather than its proximity to the event at issue.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.