Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ohio Law. Abs. 393

Whitlock v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1936

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1936-04-13

Decided 1936-04-13

¶1*394OPINION

By KLINGER, PJ.

¶2In the opinion of this court the overruling of a plea in abatement is not a final order under this section of the statutes. §13459-1 GC; §11582 GC.

¶3See: 12 Ohio Jurisprudence, 741.

¶4Wagner v State, 42 Oh St, 537.

¶5Inskeep v State, 35 Oh St 482.

¶6Inskeep v State, 36 Oh St 145.

¶7Bogart v State, 9 Abs, 436.

¶8This court, sitting in Wood County, in the case of State v James, held that a motion overruling a plea in abatement was not a final order from which error could be prosecuted and the note in the Bogart case in 9 Abs, refers to this ruling by this court.

¶9The appeal and petition in error will be dismissed at the cost of the appellants.

CROW and GUERNSEY, JJ, concur.
/21/ohiolawabs/393 · .json · Public domain