Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 OHIOST2D 162 - Miller v. Yocum

Miller v. Yocum’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2006

10 state decisions

501970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 114 Ohio St. 241 - Cleveland Trust Co. v. Scobie · Howard v. Imes · Drain v. Brookline Savings Bank · Beaver v. Redmond · 123 Ohio St. 433 - Ambrose v. Rugg, Admx.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where a person, now deceased, created during her lifetime a joint and survivorship bank account for the benefit of the survivor, and the trial court finds that the deceased intended to create a joint and survivorship account, and the evidence and the record support that finding, the fact that the decedent, after she had created the account, was declared to be an incompetent and a guardian was properly appointed for her, does not, as a matter of law, terminate the joint and survivorship nature of the account.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““By holding that the guardian has no power to exercise the discretion of his ward and withdraw all of the funds from the accounts, those courts held, by implication, that the appointment of the guardian did not per se terminate the joint and survivorship accounts.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.