Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 OHIOST2D 203 - State v. Lewis

State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2012

10 state decisions

5019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 9 Ohio St. 2d 186 - Ohio v. Pittman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where an indictment under Section 2921.14, Revised Code, for conspiracy to defraud specifies the manner of defrauding relied upon as the defrauding part of that conspiracy, the proof of a manner of defrauding that is not even suggested by any allegations of the indictment or by any bill of particulars thereunder will necessarily prejudice the accused. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The indictment, information, or affidavit in a criminal prosecution necessarily confines the state to the charge made against the defendant, in order that the defendant shall know, as the Constitution provides, `the nature of the accusation against him.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.