Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 OHIOST2D 38 - State v. Starnes

State v. Starnes’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
6
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably City of Defiance v. Kretz (1991), Campbell v. Superior Court (1971)

2 federal appellate · 104 state decisions

430197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Breithaupt v. Abram · Gideon v. Cochran · Commonwealth v. Funk · City of Westerville v. Cunningham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * shall be deemed to have given consent to a chemical test or tests of his blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the alcohol, drug, or alcohol and drug content of his blood, breath, or urine if arrested for operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol * * *.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * If the court finds that such person has shown error in the action taken by the registrar of motor vehicles under division (D) of this section or in one or more of the matters within the scope of the hearing as provided in division (F) of this section, or both, the cost of the proceedings shall be paid out of the county treasury of the county in which the proceedings were held, and the suspension provided in division (D) of this section shall not be imposed. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““2. Section 4511.191(F) * * * does not violate the due process clause of the * * * Constitution by permitting suspension of a person’s driver’s license * * *. Proceedings under Section 4511.191(F), Revised Code, are civil and administrative in nature and are intended for the protection of the traveling public, and are independent of any criminal proceedings which may be instituted pursuant to other statutes or ordinances.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.