Rose v. Haskins’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2022
3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mempa v. Rhay · Rose v. Haskins · Barnhart v. Maxwell · State ex rel. London v. Ohio Pardon & Parole Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well established in Ohio law that parole is a matter of grace. While parole is a release from confinement, the parolee is still in the legal custody of the Department of Mental Hygiene and Correction. * * * As such, a parolee has only privileges and not the claimed constitutional rights afforded him prior to conviction.. Petitioner has urged these same issues in the federal courts and has been denied relief. * * * C i # # * “ * * A state prisoner does not have a constitutional right to a hearing on a state parole revocation * * 11”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.