Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 OHIOST3D 1 - Lewis v. Connor

Lewis v. Connor’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
1
states following
December 2025
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Frysinger v. Leech (1987), Wilson v. Durrani (Slip Opinion) (2020)

3 federal appellate · 90 state decisions

34019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Scarborough v. Atlantic Coast Line R. · 132 Ohio St. 537 - State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm. · Reese v. Ohio State University Hospitals

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'A statute undertaking to provide a rule of practice, a course of procedure or a method of review, is in its very nature and essence a remedial statute.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “course of procedure or a method of review, " and thus was a remedial statute. Id. (Emphasis added.) Having reached that conclusion, the court, relying on Reese , reached a similar result: the savings statute applies to workers' compensation appeals under R.C. 4123.519 . Lewis , at 4. As the court explained, "[w]e decline to hold that appellant has entered the `twilight zone' where dismissal of her complaint without prejudice after expiration of the limitation period of R.C. 4123.519 has the same effect as a dismissal on the merits, barring any further action with respect to the same claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is neither a statute of limitations nor a tolling statute extending the [applicable] statute of limitations. Instead, it is clear that R.C. 2305.19 has no application unless an action is timely commenced and is then dismissed without prejudice after the applicable statute of limitations has run.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.