Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Okla. 489 - Lookabaugh v. Bowmaker

Lookabaugh v. Bowmaker’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
July 1949
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 1949 · most notably McCann v. McCann (1909), St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Long (1913)

26 state decisions

16019081910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hockaday v. Jones · Dunham v. Holloway · Archer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The'court may, before or after judgment, in furtherance of justice, and on such terms as may be proper, amend any pleading, process or proceeding by adding or striking out the name of any party, or correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect, or by. inserting other allegations material to the case, or conform the pleading or proceeding to the facts proved, when such amendment does not change substantially the claim or defense; and when any proceeding fails to conform, in any respect, to the provisions of this code, the court may permit the same to be made conformable thereto by amendment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.