¶1 A motion has been filed herein to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the writ of error was not sued out within 6 months from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court. Nearly 12 months elapsed from the date of the entry of the judgment in the trial court until the writ of error was sued out, and under the rule announced by this court at the present term in Edward Porter et al. v. Eck E. Brook, ante, p. 885, 97 Pac. 645, the motion should be sustained; and it is so ordered.
21 Okla. 892
97 P 648
Bickford v. Bruce
Decided September 10, 1908
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1908-09-10
<p> Error from, the United- States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, at Marietta; Hosea Townsend, Judge. </p> <p>Action by H. K. Bickford against Stanley R. Bruce and I. R. Mason. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.</p> <p>This case was tried in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, at Marietta, and judgment rendered therein on October 26, 1906, in favor of defendants in error. A writ of error was sued out and appeal perfected on October 14, 1907. The case was pending in the United States Court of Appeals of the Indian Territory at the time of the admission of the state into the Union, and is now before this court-for final disposition under the provisions of the Enabling Act.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1910
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Dismissed · Decided 1908-09-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →