Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Okla. Crim. 426 - Lyde v. State

21 Okla. Crim. 426 - Lyde v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
July 1949
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1949

7 state decisions

30192219301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the panel is formed from persons whose names are not drawn as jurors, a challenge may be taken to the panel on account of any bias of the officer who summoned them, which would be good ground of challenge to a juror. Such challenge must be made in the same form, and determined in the same manner as if made to a juror.” Section 2665, C. S. 1921.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.