21 Or. App. 186 - Appleman v. Employment Division’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “: 67 relate directly or indirectly to operations which are commonly regarded as associated with farming in its traditional sense, i.e., where the work performed is directly or indirectly connected with the production and sale of that which the land yields annually in the form of crops or animals. This, we think, was intended in defining”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bresgal v. Brock · Bresgal v. Brock

2. “the growing of trees, or in this case seedlings, is not understood in the common parlance as an agricultural operation. 68 Id. 534 P.2d at 220 [footnote omitted]. The court further found that timber tree seedlings were not”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bresgal v. Brock · Bresgal v. Brock

3. “regardless of whether the seedlings are sold to others or retained and raised for timber. Although, as the court explained in Just-A-Mere, it is not uncommon to refer to timber as a”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bresgal v. Brock · Bresgal v. Brock