¶2[1] This proceeding has for its purpose the question as to the true boundary lines of the City of Crescent City, and therefore, for the reasons set forth in action No. 4854, entitled "City of CrescentCity, a Municipal Corporation, Petitioner, v. G. Fletcher Dodd,as City Clerk and Ex-officio Assessor of City of Crescent City,Respondent" (ante, p. 153 [18 P.2d 999]), is hereby dismissed. *787
21 P.2d 141
Hansen v. Dodd
Decided April 10, 1933
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1951
2 state decisions
Relies on Jenicek v. Barman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1933-04-10
View the full empirical analysis of this case →