Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 P.3d 249 - State v. Turnbow

State v. Turnbow’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lyon v. Burton · State v. Green · State v. Moss · State v. Rawlings · State v. Moya

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] plea in abeyance differs from probation in both its statutory provisions and function. Thus, cases decided under the probation statutes are not directly applicable to pleas in abeyance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “failed to substantially comply with any term or condition of the plea in abeyance agreement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Iwlhen a plea in abeyance agreement is approved, the trial court agrees to accept a guilty plea but not, at that time, enter a conviction nor impose a sen tence on the condition that the defendant comply with the conditions set forth in the agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.