State v. Gore’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
91
cited by 91 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
1 district · 85 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Franks v. Delaware
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] reason offered to justify an exceptional sentence can be considered only if it takes into account factors other than those which are used in computing the standard range sentence for the offense.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“neither increase the maximum sentence nor define a separate offense calling for a separate penalty.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ermels · State v. Hopkins“[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.